For security professionals the implications are unclear. What if a death occurs as a result of an incorrect security decision or a bad or non-existent security procedures?
Workplace Law has produced a primer on the Act, which can be purchased from their website at a cost of £41.11:
http://www.workplacelaw.net/eshop/product_info.php?product_id=601
A good explanation of the factors which led to the legislation can be found at:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4537053.stm
Critics argue that the Act fails to provide extraterritorial jurisdiction. This means there will be certain circumstances where corporate manslaughter legislation does not apply. If a company is managed in England and a fatality occurs on a site abroad, then the legislation will not apply. If the same way, if a British employee travelled to a foreign site and suffered a suffered a fatality, corporate manslaughter charges could not be brought.
A further problem with the legislation is that if an injury that causes death happens in the UK and the company is based abroad it is unlikely that a prosecution would occur. It is unlikely that managers would be extradited to face prosecution so corporate manslaughter charges would be avoided.